You are here: ProjetSEG Web>MilestoneThreeStatusReport (18 Mar 2005)

Status Report

Project: UCMNav Eclipse Plug-in

Iteration: Milestone Three

Implementation Status

In a sentence or two briefly describe what can currently be run to demonstrate the system. In other words, what is now available for feedback from the customer and testing within the development team? Attach or include a few sample screen shows to illustrate the progress.

In this iteration, we created a new prototype that allows us to mitigate the risks associated with the paths, one of the most complex elements in our application. We succeed in creating the desired behaviour and appearance using what was available in the GEF framework. Furthermore, we migrated this prototype away from our prototype model to the model supplied by our customer.




List any items of note. Breakthroughs, accomplishments, major decisions, or changes in the project plan. Are you on schedule, ahead of schedule or behind schedule?

  • Model received from client.
  • Quality Assurance process defined.
  • Paths are now rendered as splines.
  • Model is integrated in our prototype.
  • UCM Element behaviour analyzed
  • We know how we are going to test our requirements and we know when they will be considered complete.
  • Change Request process put in place.

In terms of the proposed milestone iterations, we are late in quality assurance. However, we have realized that following this exact model isn't fit for us as we are integration tons of varied small features inside a huge framework. Our tests need to be defined at the same time as our architecture. As far as our prototypes go, we're way ahead of schedule. We know exactly what we have to do for 80% of our requirements because we have done so much prototyping.

Risks or Issues List

In the following table, list any risk or issue that needs to be managed that is critical to the success of the project. This could be anything from we need to get good test data from our customer, to how do we ensure the system is usable, to performance is unacceptable. This should be a complete historical list that is kept from the beginning of the project until the end. Status should be one of New, Ongoing, Closed. The resolution column should be filled in if the issue or risk is closed. Normally, I would expect a project to have about 1-5 issues or risks they are managing that are New or Ongoing at any given time. If you have more than that then either you have a project in serious trouble or your criteria for what is 'critical to success' is to loose.

Date Entered Risk or Issue Description Resolution Status
05 Jan 2005 Eclipse is an evolving platform Eclipse/GEF is rapidly evolving and the current version (3.1) has not yet been released as stable. We have decided to settle on version 3.0.1 of all Eclipse tools that we will be using. Closed
05 Jan 2005 New Tools We are using various tools that we don't necessarily have experience with: Ant, BugZilla, CVS, DOORS, Eclipse+GEF+EMF, JUnit, Rational XDE, TWiki, UCMNav See below Closed
05 Jan 2005 Varying schedules Must find way so that all team members can contribute equally, regardless of schedule differences. - Ongoing
05 Jan 2005 Difficult deployment We may have to support different versions of Eclipse, testing different operating systems, distributing the plug-in with and without Eclipse We have decided on supporting only Eclipse/GEF version 3.0.1 and EMF v2.0.1, testing only on Windows XP SP2 and distributing the plug-in without Eclipse. Closed
23 Jan 2005 New version of the DTD We await the new version of the DTD that we will have to support (read/write). UCM Version 0.23 is already on the website Supporting the DTD is no longer in the scope of our project Closed
23 Jan 2005 Requirements We have defined the requirements definition process in which Daniel Amyot will have an important role but they have yet to be drafted Requirements have been drafted. Closed
15 Feb 2005 Meta-model We await our meta-model draft for the notation's elements to be used by our tool We have received it and integrated it. Closed
15 Feb 2005 Paths We're not sure how paths will be implemented in our system. Must experiment. Experimentation done, success! Closed
15 Feb 2005 Element behaviour We're not sure how we will determine our element's behaviour. We're not sure to what point our meta-model will define this. We want to avoid having to specify this for all elements. We have analyzed and categorized our elements behaviour Closed
15 Feb 2005 Stubs Stubs are the second riskiest UCM element. They have deep implications in many views and the editor but haven't bene prototyped. - Ongoing
15 Feb 2005 Divide and conquer Requirements need to be divided into micro objectives that can be tracked in our task management system. Until then, we can't plan completion - Ongoing
15 Feb 2005 Unit tests We haven't formally written down our unit tests as they are too closely bound to our architecture. - Ongoing
15 Feb 2005 Get Coding Not everyone is as familiar with the framework because not everyone was prototyping - Ongoing

New Tools

  • BugZilla/CVS/Rational tools: Already familiar.
  • TWiki: Passed the critical level, very easy to use.
  • Ant/JUnit: Tested on prototypes, learnt in SEG4511.
  • DOORS: Abandoned in favor of TWiki.
  • UCMNav: We have three experts to help us. We are only replicating the tool's basic functionality.
  • Eclipse+GEF+EMF: Developing Java in Eclipse is a breeze. Developing plug-ins with GEF and EMF requires lots of reading and experimenting. Our hello world prototype has allowed us to feel comfortable with GEF and EMF.

Tasks in Progress or Completed This Iteration:

List the tasks that each member of the project worked on last iteration.

Task Name Description Who Worked on it %complete
Build prototype views Define and prototype all the views in the system. Major UI work here. Olivier Clift Noel?, Jean Philippe Daigle? 100%
Define QA process Define QA process Olivier Clift Noel?, Jason Kealey 100%
Test plan Write the test plan for our different requirements Olivier Clift Noel? 100%
Views Implement first version of all views Jean Philippe Daigle? 50%
UI Implementation Define all hooks that must be made for relevant notifications Jean Philippe Daigle? 50%
Define editpart hierarchy So that we can bind paths to components, etc. Jordan Mc Manus? 25%
Investigate coding Attempt to code as many features as possible to understand what needs to be done and what can be done very quickly in our prototype. Jordan Mc Manus? 70%
Redefine architecture Following lessons learned, redesign the system so that our architecture is sufficiently robust to continue development Etienne Tremblay 50%
Refine requirements According to feedback, go to a more granular level for requirements so that our team knows exactly what needs to be implemented. Jason Kealey 80%
Research Use Case Maps Need to define a way to express how elements can behave together but first, we need to know what these behaviours are. Jason Kealey 80%
Integrate new model Replace our old temporary model with the draft supplied by Daniel Etienne Tremblay 100%
Change Request process Form + process put online on TWiki. Jason Kealey 100%
Prepare presentation for Milestone Three Olivier Clift Noel?, Jean Philippe Daigle?, Jason Kealey 100%

Tasks to be worked on next Iteration:

List the tasks that each member of the project is planning on working on this iteration.

Task Name Description Who Will Work on it
Decompose requirements into micro-objectives in BugZilla Jason Kealey
Architecture define global architecture Etienne Tremblay
Formal tests Write down formal tests for all requirements Olivier Clift Noel?
Use Cases Develop formal use cases to be tested Jean Philippe Daigle?
Write Edit Commands?/EditPolicies/EditParts Start coding various portions of the implementation that are to be used in automated tests All
Topic attachments
I Attachment Action Size Date Who Comment
pngPNG prototype1.PNG manage 42.1 K 17 Mar 2005 - 12:23 Unknown User  
Topic revision: r4 - 18 Mar 2005 - 00:01:22 - Jason Kealey
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Foswiki? Send feedback